For the Benefit of All: Fiscal Policies and Equity-Efficiency Trade-offs in the Age of Automation
Author:
Mr. Andrew Berg
Search for other papers by Mr. Andrew Berg in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Lahcen Bounader null

Search for other papers by Lahcen Bounader in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Nikolay Gueorguiev null

Search for other papers by Nikolay Gueorguiev in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Hiroaki Miyamoto null

Search for other papers by Hiroaki Miyamoto in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Kenji Moriyama
Search for other papers by Mr. Kenji Moriyama in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ryota Nakatani
Search for other papers by Ryota Nakatani in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Luis-Felipe Zanna
Search for other papers by Luis-Felipe Zanna in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Many studies predict massive job losses and real wage decline as a result of the ongoing widespread automation of production, a trend that may be further aggravated by the COVID-19 crisis. Yet automation is also expected to raise productivity and output. How can we share the gains from automation more widely, for the benefit of all? And what are the attendant equity-efficiency trade-offs? We analyze this issue by considering the effects of fiscal policies that seek to redistribute the gains from automation and address income inequality. We use a dynamic general equilibrium model with monopolistic competition, including a novel specification linking corporate power to automation. While fiscal policy cannot eliminate the classic equity-efficiency trade-offs, it can help improve them, reducing inequality at small or no loss of output. This is particularly so when policy takes advantage of novel, less distortive transmission channels of fiscal policy created by the empirically observed link between corporate market power and automation.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
IMF Working Papers